01
Choose the association that serves the actual offer
A spreadsheet resource would benefit from a direct description such as scenario worksheets for small workshops. A broader training concept might instead emphasise practice and performance. Those are possible readings, not an established origin story for the domain. Choosing one primary direction would make the homepage more useful than asking the name to communicate every potential use at once. The descriptive line should be specific enough that someone can tell whether the page offers a file, a lesson or help with their own existing model.
02
Keep simulation claims proportional to the method
A worksheet that multiplies sessions by seats can support a simple scenario without representing uncertainty or simulating individual bookings. The distinction should remain visible in the product language. If a future resource uses random inputs or more advanced methods, its explanation should describe them and state what the results represent. The short sim ending creates room for that development, but does not establish those capabilities by itself. Naming the actual method helps readers choose an appropriate resource and prevents a polished visual from implying more than the calculation supports.
03
Build an independent and readable presentation
The capital S makes the boundary between the two parts easy to see in a heading. Supporting graphics could use labelled cells, input markers and clear paths to outputs. A spreadsheet-oriented project should identify itself independently and describe application compatibility only where it is supported. The proposed identity does not imply an association with a spreadsheet vendor. Navigation such as scenario notes and worksheet guide can make the subject clear. A restrained layout would leave enough space for explanatory notes, which are often as important as the headline output.